Remove center console for ford escort
Sorry, nope, This is what I mean when I said long ago that facts don't matter with your ilk. When textual analysis proves that the version in your bible was originally composed in Greek, from the sources, and will not even translate back into Aramaic coherently, and shows a mastery of the Greek language beyond the non native writer, etc. the evidence in front of historian's faces over rides church tradition, and your bs biased religious sources. sorry. Religious biased sources obviously have a motive to maintain the church's narrative, they are not neutral. Because you can quote some biased historians that lie entirely outside the bounds of the mass of biblical scholarly opinion, and call it evidence, doesn't make it evidence of anything beyond their bias. The truth is that the evidence for or against a position will eventually find a consensus in the biblical history field, and that's because the evidence actually points to something. We know for a fact that much of church tradition on a number of these issues goes back, originally, to some church father speculating on who wrote what, or what they have been told. The first is called guessing, and the latter called hearsay, and then that speculation is picked up and repeated as the gospel like this one. Most seem to end up as nothing but what they wanted to think about it. Others have been shown to be neigh on to historically impossible, like this one. Most believe that from the few descriptive things in surviving writings of Papias that the text he's talking about was not the Gospel of Matthew in your bible in the first place, and likely a text lost to us, like the Q document. He never referred to it as anything but logia. You are being anything BUT logical, not that I expected it of you. The gospel of Matthew was written by an anonymous Greek writer between the years of 70 to 85, in the mass of historian's opinions. That you can find some biased sources does not override the mass of Biblical historian's consensus. You remind me, in this, of the creationists that mangle science to justify their faith. You start out with a destination in mind, determined by your religious faith, call to it all evidence, real and imagined, to get you to that destination, while ignoring anything that does not. That's not science, and what you've presented here isn't history, either.
Your comments (18)
- Samushicage 3 months ago
You would think Paul Manafort was in charge!
- Dugar 3 months ago
Jesus Christ never existed.
- Gardasho 2 months ago
"Selectivity of standing to Muslim fanatics... is upsetting."
- Dagrel 2 months ago
I'm all for better fuel economy and reduced emissions.
- Shaktilkis 2 months ago
Trying to escape Nirvana makes you a thug?
- Akihn 2 months ago
I was just threatening to ..:) LOL!!!
- Doushura 2 months ago
"Serve"? Newspeak for obstruct?
- Dataur 1 month ago
Nice.. you dated anyone before?
- Nikozuru 1 month ago
I would be selling HOCKEY.
- Jujas 1 month ago
Yes. Because this is comparing apples to elephants.
- Fem 1 month ago
The Atlantic Slave Trade 25 million dead
- Mikalabar 1 month ago
so now the plot thickens. hahah
- Tygonos 1 month ago
Casino? If not, Good Fellas.
- Kigis 3 weeks ago
LMFAO????????my mouth dropped open??????
- Voodoot 3 weeks ago
You didn't have to, but that's fine!
- Kazradal 2 weeks ago
Doesn?t make a difference.
- Malakasa 2 weeks ago
True that it won't happen.
- Mausho 5 days ago
the Bible never mentions Australia